Timesys vs eInfochips: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Timesys (4.1/5) edges ahead of eInfochips (4.0/5) overall. Timesys is the better choice for US buyers needing onshore Linux security patching and CVE tracking. eInfochips is the stronger option for buyers wanting India offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Timesys vs eInfochips: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Timesys | eInfochips |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 1994 |
| HQ | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) |
| Team size | 51–200 | 1,000–5,000 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies | Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access |
| Pricing model | Engineering services, tooling licenses | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching | Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++ |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor |
Timesys vs eInfochips: overview
Timesys
Timesys Corporation, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is a US-onshore embedded Linux security and long-term maintenance specialist with roughly 60 employees. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys; outsourcing buyers evaluating the company should confirm current organizational continuity directly, since ownership transitions are exactly the kind of thing due diligence should verify rather than assume from the historical brand.
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering firm, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company. India-based delivery from Ahmedabad represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally, and Arrow Electronics ownership adds direct component-sourcing access — a genuine outsourcing differentiator for buyers whose program needs supply-chain risk bundled with engineering delivery.
Services and capabilities: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Capability | Timesys | eInfochips |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Framework / platform | Timesys | eInfochips |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | ✓ |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | ✓ |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Criterion | Timesys | eInfochips |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Dimension | Timesys | eInfochips |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments, Programs needing CVE monitoring as an outsourced ongoing service, not just initial development | Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management, Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers |
| Typical project type | Engineering services | Fixed project |
Timesys vs eInfochips: pros and cons
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | US-onshore delivery simplifies contracting and IP terms for American buyers wary of offshore-only security-sensitive work |
| + | Explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring), an underserved outsourcing category |
| + | Long operating history (since 1996) means extensive documentation and tooling maturity |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — confirm directly which legacy Timesys team and processes are still active before committing |
| - | US-onshore delivery carries a cost premium versus nearshore or offshore embedded Linux alternatives |
| - | Team size (~60) caps capacity for large outsourcing programs |
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally |
| + | Arrow Electronics ownership gives direct component-sourcing access, useful for buyers wanting supply-chain risk bundled with outsourced engineering |
| + | 30-year product engineering history with 500+ documented deliveries supports strong reference-checking |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger distribution company; confirm dedicated team continuity |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| - | Reported team size estimates vary significantly by source, making exact outsourcing capacity harder to pin down |
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments.
US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management.
Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.
Decision matrix: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Timesys (Not disclosed) vs eInfochips (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Timesys |
Use case fit: Timesys vs eInfochips
| Use case | Timesys fit | eInfochips fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Programs needing CVE monitoring as an outsourced ongoing service, not just initial development | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers | Limited | Strong | eInfochips |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Timesys vs eInfochips
Timesys (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Outsourcing projects. US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies.
eInfochips (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers. If your situation matches that, eInfochips is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Timesys vs eInfochips FAQ
Is Timesys better than eInfochips?
Timesys (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Timesys's strongest advantage: US-onshore delivery simplifies contracting and IP terms for American buyers wary of offshore-only security-sensitive work. eInfochips's strongest advantage: Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally.
How do Timesys and eInfochips differ in pricing?
Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Timesys or eInfochips?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Timesys and eInfochips?
Timesys's primary differentiator is: US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies. eInfochips's primary differentiator is: established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1,000–5,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Medical devices vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.