Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.6/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for western European buyers wanting nearshore Ukraine cost with EU offices. Sirin Software is the stronger option for US buyers wanting US contracting with Ukraine-cost engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 200+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Genuine nearshore-Europe delivery model — Ukraine engineering cost with Hamburg, London, and Kraków offices for EU client-facing presence and contract jurisdiction | US-front, Ukraine-delivery structure — US contracting entity with substantially lower-cost offshore engineering in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Zephyr, FreeRTOS, ThreadX |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home, Semiconductor |
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is a 200+ person embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. For a buyer specifically evaluating outsourcing geography, this is a genuine nearshore-Europe setup rather than a marketing claim: Ukraine delivery gives Western European and North American clients a substantial cost advantage over onshore engineering, while the Hamburg, London, and Kraków offices provide EU-based client-facing presence, contract jurisdiction options, and overlapping business hours with Western Europe. The firm covers electrical engineering, firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, connectivity, edge AI, and cybersecurity under ISO 9001/27001/13485 certification, with full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery — a standard, non-negotiable term worth confirming explicitly with any outsourcing partner.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software, founded in 2014, is headquartered in Pompano Beach, Florida with R&D centers in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine — a deliberate US-front, Ukraine-delivery structure that gives American buyers a single US contracting entity while the actual engineering work happens at Ukraine's substantially lower cost base. This structure is common among boutique outsourcing firms and worth understanding explicitly: the client relationship and invoicing run through the US entity, while day-to-day engineering is offshore.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | ✓ |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home |
| Best use cases | Western European teams wanting to extend an in-house embedded team with nearshore Ukraine engineers at lower cost than onshore hiring, North American buyers evaluating a nearshore-to-Europe alternative to offshore-Asia outsourcing for closer timezone overlap | US buyers wanting the legal simplicity of a US contracting entity with offshore-Ukraine engineering cost, Semiconductor companies needing SDK and driver development at boutique-firm pricing |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine nearshore-Europe cost structure — Ukraine delivery pricing with Western European (Hamburg, London, Kraków) offices for client-facing contracting |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give an outsourcing buyer a documented quality and information-security management system, not just a verbal assurance |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer to the client on delivery — the single most important term to verify with any offshore or nearshore partner |
| + | Team extension (staff augmentation) is offered as an explicit, named engagement model alongside full delivery, useful for buyers wanting to scale an existing in-house team |
| + | Named clients (Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, Bosch Rexroth) give an outsourcing buyer checkable references before committing |
| - | Does not manufacture at scale — buyers outsourcing an entire hardware program through mass production will still need a separate manufacturing partner |
| - | Does not carry regulatory certification itself — supports documentation but the client retains ownership of the certification process |
| - | No published rate card — cost comparison against other nearshore/offshore vendors requires a direct quote |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based contracting entity simplifies invoicing and legal terms for American clients while engineering is delivered offshore at lower cost |
| + | Named depth across six wireless protocols (Wi-Fi, BLE, Matter, UWB, NFC, LoRaWAN) reduces the need to outsource each protocol to a different specialist |
| + | Staff augmentation is offered explicitly, useful for buyers wanting to extend an existing in-house team with offshore capacity |
| - | Small team (11-50, varying by source) limits capacity for large outsourcing programs needing many parallel engineers |
| - | Buyers should confirm directly which portion of a given engagement is US-based versus Ukraine-based before assuming a specific cost structure |
| - | No published rate card or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: western European teams wanting to extend an in-house embedded team with nearshore Ukraine engineers at lower cost than onshore hiring.
Genuine nearshore-Europe delivery model — Ukraine engineering cost with Hamburg, London, and Kraków offices for EU client-facing presence and contract jurisdiction. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: US buyers wanting the legal simplicity of a US contracting entity with offshore-Ukraine engineering cost.
US-front, Ukraine-delivery structure — US contracting entity with substantially lower-cost offshore engineering in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Smart home, Semiconductor.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Sirin Software (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western European teams wanting to extend an in-house embedded team with nearshore Ukraine engineers at lower cost than onshore hiring | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| North American buyers evaluating a nearshore-to-Europe alternative to offshore-Asia outsourcing for closer timezone overlap | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| US buyers wanting the legal simplicity of a US contracting entity with offshore-Ukraine engineering cost | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Semiconductor companies needing SDK and driver development at boutique-firm pricing | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Outsourcing projects. Genuine nearshore-Europe delivery model — Ukraine engineering cost with Hamburg, London, and Kraków offices for EU client-facing presence and contract jurisdiction.
Sirin Software (4.6/5) is worth a look if you need semiconductor companies needing SDK and driver development at boutique-firm pricing. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Sirin Software?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: genuine nearshore-Europe cost structure — Ukraine delivery pricing with Western European (Hamburg, London, Kraków) offices for client-facing contracting. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: US-based contracting entity simplifies invoicing and legal terms for American clients while engineering is delivered offshore at lower cost.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Sirin Software uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Sirin Software?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Sirin Software?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: genuine nearshore-Europe delivery model — Ukraine engineering cost with Hamburg, London, and Kraków offices for EU client-facing presence and contract jurisdiction. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US-front, Ukraine-delivery structure — US contracting entity with substantially lower-cost offshore engineering in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.