Timesys vs Data Respons: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Timesys (4.1/5) edges ahead of Data Respons (3.8/5) overall. Timesys is the better choice for US buyers needing onshore Linux security patching and CVE tracking. Data Respons is the stronger option for buyers wanting Nordic-onshore delivery with a Taiwan Asia option. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Timesys vs Data Respons: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 1986 |
| HQ | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA | Høvik, Norway |
| Team size | 51–200 | 1,400 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies | Rare Nordic-plus-Asia (Taiwan) outsourcing footprint spanning eight regulated sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions |
| Pricing model | Engineering services, tooling licenses | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching | Embedded Linux, C/C++, RTOS |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security |
Timesys vs Data Respons: overview
Timesys
Timesys Corporation, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is a US-onshore embedded Linux security and long-term maintenance specialist with roughly 60 employees. In December 2023, Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys; outsourcing buyers evaluating the company should confirm current organizational continuity directly, since ownership transitions are exactly the kind of thing due diligence should verify rather than assume from the historical brand.
Data Respons
Data Respons, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Høvik, Norway, develops embedded systems across eight regulated sectors, employing roughly 1,400 people across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Taiwan. As a Nordic-onshore vendor with a Taiwan delivery office, Data Respons offers a rare Nordic-plus-Asia outsourcing footprint, though two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA Technologies in 2020, then folded into Akkodis) mean buyers should request current organizational-continuity documentation before committing.
Services and capabilities: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Capability | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Framework / platform | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Bluetooth | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Criterion | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Dimension | Timesys | Data Respons |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking | Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime |
| Best use cases | US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments, Programs needing CVE monitoring as an outsourced ongoing service, not just initial development | Buyers wanting a Nordic-onshore vendor with a Taiwan-based Asia delivery option under one contract, Maritime or defense outsourcing requiring embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity |
| Typical project type | Engineering services | Fixed project |
Timesys vs Data Respons: pros and cons
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | US-onshore delivery simplifies contracting and IP terms for American buyers wary of offshore-only security-sensitive work |
| + | Explicit specialty in the multi-year maintenance tail (security patching, CVE monitoring), an underserved outsourcing category |
| + | Long operating history (since 1996) means extensive documentation and tooling maturity |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — confirm directly which legacy Timesys team and processes are still active before committing |
| - | US-onshore delivery carries a cost premium versus nearshore or offshore embedded Linux alternatives |
| - | Team size (~60) caps capacity for large outsourcing programs |
| Data Respons | |
|---|---|
| + | Nordic-plus-Asia (Taiwan) footprint is a rare combination among the outsourcing options on this list |
| + | Nearly 40 years of embedded systems specialization across eight distinct regulated sectors supports strong reference-checking |
| + | Retains a genuinely embedded-focused delivery team despite two ownership transitions |
| - | Two ownership transitions in five years (AKKA 2020, then Akkodis) — request current organizational-continuity documentation as part of vendor due diligence |
| - | 1,400-employee scale sits below the largest global outsourcing firms for very large concurrent programs |
| - | No published rate card or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments.
US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Who should choose Data Respons?
A typical fit: buyers wanting a Nordic-onshore vendor with a Taiwan-based Asia delivery option under one contract.
Rare Nordic-plus-Asia (Taiwan) outsourcing footprint spanning eight regulated sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media, Energy & Maritime, Medtech, Defense & Security.
Decision matrix: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Data Respons |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Data Respons |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Timesys (Not disclosed) vs Data Respons (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Data Respons |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Timesys |
Use case fit: Timesys vs Data Respons
| Use case | Timesys fit | Data Respons fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| US buyers wanting onshore embedded Linux security patching for products with long support commitments | Strong | Limited | Timesys |
| Programs needing CVE monitoring as an outsourced ongoing service, not just initial development | Strong | Limited | Timesys |
| Buyers wanting a Nordic-onshore vendor with a Taiwan-based Asia delivery option under one contract | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Maritime or defense outsourcing requiring embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity | Limited | Strong | Data Respons |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Timesys vs Data Respons
Timesys (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Outsourcing projects. US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies.
Data Respons (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need maritime or defense outsourcing requiring embedded systems with Nordic regulatory familiarity. If your situation matches that, Data Respons is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Timesys vs Data Respons FAQ
Is Timesys better than Data Respons?
Timesys (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Timesys's strongest advantage: US-onshore delivery simplifies contracting and IP terms for American buyers wary of offshore-only security-sensitive work. Data Respons's strongest advantage: Nordic-plus-Asia (Taiwan) footprint is a rare combination among the outsourcing options on this list.
How do Timesys and Data Respons differ in pricing?
Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Data Respons uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Timesys or Data Respons?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Timesys and Data Respons?
Timesys's primary differentiator is: US-onshore embedded Linux security specialist with nearly three decades of maintenance-tail expertise, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Data Respons's primary differentiator is: rare Nordic-plus-Asia (Taiwan) outsourcing footprint spanning eight regulated sectors, now backed by Akkodis scale after two ownership transitions. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1,400), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Medical devices vs Transportation & Automotive, Telecom & Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.