Best Embedded Software Outsourcing Companies

Elektrobit vs eInfochips: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Elektrobit (4.2/5) edges ahead of eInfochips (4.0/5) overall. Elektrobit is the better choice for automotive buyers already outsourcing manufacturing to Continental. eInfochips is the stronger option for buyers wanting India offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Elektrobit vs eInfochips: head-to-head summary

Criterion Elektrobit eInfochips
Founded 1988 1994
HQ Erlangen, Germany San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India)
Team size 1,000–5,000 1,000–5,000
Rating 4.2 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Continental-affiliated outsourcing partner with software in 600M+ vehicles, relevant for buyers consolidating embedded and manufacturing outsourcing under one corporate family Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access
Pricing model Fixed project, licensing, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack AUTOSAR, C/C++, Embedded Linux Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++
Industries served Automotive Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor

Elektrobit vs eInfochips: overview

Elektrobit

Elektrobit, established in 1988 in Erlangen, Germany, has built embedded and connected software running in more than 600 million vehicles. As a wholly-owned Continental subsidiary since 2015, Elektrobit's outsourcing relationship comes bundled with Continental's global Tier 1 manufacturing footprint — relevant for automotive buyers already outsourcing hardware manufacturing to Continental and wanting embedded software delivery from the same corporate family, though buyers should weigh the reduced vendor independence that comes with a Tier 1-affiliated outsourcing partner.

eInfochips

eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering firm, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company. India-based delivery from Ahmedabad represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally, and Arrow Electronics ownership adds direct component-sourcing access — a genuine outsourcing differentiator for buyers whose program needs supply-chain risk bundled with engineering delivery.

Services and capabilities: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Capability Elektrobit eInfochips
RTOS firmware development
Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot)
FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL)
Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering
IoT connectivity & protocols
Edge AI / on-device ML
Embedded GUI development
Cybersecurity & secure boot
Staff augmentation / team extension

Tech stack comparison: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Framework / platform Elektrobit eInfochips
FreeRTOS N/A
Zephyr N/A N/A
Embedded Linux
AUTOSAR N/A
AWS N/A
Bluetooth N/A
LoRaWAN N/A N/A
CAN bus N/A N/A
Qt N/A
Verilog N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Criterion Elektrobit eInfochips
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Licensing, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Dimension Elektrobit eInfochips
Best company size Mid-market to enterprise Mid-market to enterprise
Best industries Automotive Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare
Best use cases Automotive buyers wanting to consolidate embedded software and manufacturing outsourcing under the Continental corporate family, OEM programs needing AUTOSAR-compliant ECU software at production scale from an established Tier 1-affiliated vendor Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management, Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Elektrobit vs eInfochips: pros and cons

Elektrobit
+ Software deployed in over 600 million vehicles — a production-scale reference point most outsourcing vendors can't match
+ Continental affiliation lets buyers already outsourcing manufacturing to Continental consolidate embedded software delivery under the same corporate relationship
+ Three engagement models (fixed project, licensing, dedicated team) give outsourcing buyers pricing-structure flexibility
- Wholly-owned Continental subsidiary since 2015 — vendor-independence considerations apply if you're outsourcing specifically to avoid Tier 1 lock-in
- Automotive-exclusive focus means zero relevant experience for non-automotive outsourcing categories
- No public pricing or minimum engagement figures published
eInfochips
+ Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally
+ Arrow Electronics ownership gives direct component-sourcing access, useful for buyers wanting supply-chain risk bundled with outsourced engineering
+ 30-year product engineering history with 500+ documented deliveries supports strong reference-checking
- Owned by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger distribution company; confirm dedicated team continuity
- Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed
- Reported team size estimates vary significantly by source, making exact outsourcing capacity harder to pin down

Who should choose Elektrobit?

A typical fit: automotive buyers wanting to consolidate embedded software and manufacturing outsourcing under the Continental corporate family.

Continental-affiliated outsourcing partner with software in 600M+ vehicles, relevant for buyers consolidating embedded and manufacturing outsourcing under one corporate family. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.

Who should choose eInfochips?

A typical fit: buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management.

Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.

Decision matrix: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Elektrobit
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Elektrobit
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Elektrobit (Not disclosed) vs eInfochips (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical eInfochips
You need staff augmentation or team extension eInfochips
You need consulting before committing to a build Elektrobit

Use case fit: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Use case Elektrobit fit eInfochips fit Winner
Automotive buyers wanting to consolidate embedded software and manufacturing outsourcing under the Continental corporate family Strong Limited Elektrobit
OEM programs needing AUTOSAR-compliant ECU software at production scale from an established Tier 1-affiliated vendor Strong Limited Elektrobit
Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management Strong Strong Both equally
Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers Limited Strong eInfochips
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Elektrobit vs eInfochips

Elektrobit (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Outsourcing projects. Continental-affiliated outsourcing partner with software in 600M+ vehicles, relevant for buyers consolidating embedded and manufacturing outsourcing under one corporate family.

eInfochips (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers. If your situation matches that, eInfochips is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Elektrobit vs eInfochips FAQ

Is Elektrobit better than eInfochips?

Elektrobit (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Elektrobit's strongest advantage: software deployed in over 600 million vehicles — a production-scale reference point most outsourcing vendors can't match. eInfochips's strongest advantage: Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally.

How do Elektrobit and eInfochips differ in pricing?

Elektrobit uses fixed project, licensing, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Elektrobit or eInfochips?

Elektrobit is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Elektrobit and eInfochips?

Elektrobit's primary differentiator is: continental-affiliated outsourcing partner with software in 600M+ vehicles, relevant for buyers consolidating embedded and manufacturing outsourcing under one corporate family. eInfochips's primary differentiator is: established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 1,000–5,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive vs Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.