eInfochips vs Cyient: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.0/5) edges ahead of Cyient (3.7/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for buyers wanting India offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing. Cyient is the stronger option for aerospace buyers wanting India-offshore avionics engineering at scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Cyient: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 1991 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Hyderabad, India |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 15,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access | India-offshore aerospace avionics outsourcing (fly-by-wire, autopilot, collision avoidance) strengthened by the CERTON Software acquisition |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux (Yocto), FreeRTOS, C/C++ | Embedded C/C++, DO-178C-aware development, RTOS |
| Industries served | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor | Aerospace, Defense, Manufacturing |
eInfochips vs Cyient: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 in Ahmedabad, India and has grown into a large product engineering firm, now operating as an Arrow Electronics company. India-based delivery from Ahmedabad represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally, and Arrow Electronics ownership adds direct component-sourcing access — a genuine outsourcing differentiator for buyers whose program needs supply-chain risk bundled with engineering delivery.
Cyient
Cyient was established in 1991 in Hyderabad, India as Infotech Enterprises Ltd and rebranded to Cyient in 2014 — a naming history outsourcing buyers should research under both names. India-based delivery at 15,000+ engineer scale gives Cyient significant offshore capacity, strengthened for avionics-specific outsourcing by the acquisition of CERTON Software, a dedicated avionics software firm.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Capability | eInfochips | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Criterion | eInfochips | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Dimension | eInfochips | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare | Aerospace, Defense, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management, Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers | Aerospace buyers wanting India-offshore avionics engineering with a dedicated avionics-software acquisition track record, Defense outsourcing requiring DO-178C-aware embedded development at scale |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Cyient: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally |
| + | Arrow Electronics ownership gives direct component-sourcing access, useful for buyers wanting supply-chain risk bundled with outsourced engineering |
| + | 30-year product engineering history with 500+ documented deliveries supports strong reference-checking |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics — embedded engineering is one line of business inside a much larger distribution company; confirm dedicated team continuity |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement figures are not disclosed |
| - | Reported team size estimates vary significantly by source, making exact outsourcing capacity harder to pin down |
| Cyient | |
|---|---|
| + | India-offshore delivery at 15,000+ engineer scale supports large aerospace outsourcing programs |
| + | Acquisition of CERTON Software added dedicated avionics software engineering depth to the outsourcing offering |
| + | Rebranded from Infotech Enterprises in 2014 — over 30 years of underlying engineering services history to research under both names |
| - | Rebranded from Infotech Enterprises Ltd in 2014 — outsourcing due diligence should search vendor track record under both names |
| - | Aerospace/defense weighting means less demonstrated relevance for consumer or industrial IoT outsourcing |
| - | Exact current headcount and pricing figures vary by source and aren't officially disclosed |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management.
Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT, Healthcare, Automotive, Semiconductor.
Who should choose Cyient?
A typical fit: aerospace buyers wanting India-offshore avionics engineering with a dedicated avionics-software acquisition track record.
India-offshore aerospace avionics outsourcing (fly-by-wire, autopilot, collision avoidance) strengthened by the CERTON Software acquisition. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Aerospace, Defense, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs Cyient (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Cyient
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Cyient fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting established India-offshore delivery bundled with component sourcing and supply-chain risk management | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Global outsourcing programs needing round-the-clock delivery across India, Japan, and US design centers | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Aerospace buyers wanting India-offshore avionics engineering with a dedicated avionics-software acquisition track record | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| Defense outsourcing requiring DO-178C-aware embedded development at scale | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Cyient
eInfochips (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software Outsourcing projects. Established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access.
Cyient (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need defense outsourcing requiring DO-178C-aware embedded development at scale. If your situation matches that, Cyient is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Cyient FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Cyient?
eInfochips (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: Ahmedabad, India delivery represents one of the most established offshore embedded engineering corridors globally. Cyient's strongest advantage: india-offshore delivery at 15,000+ engineer scale supports large aerospace outsourcing programs.
How do eInfochips and Cyient differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Cyient uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Cyient?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Cyient?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: established India (Ahmedabad) offshore engineering delivery, backed by Arrow Electronics ownership for direct component-sourcing access. Cyient's primary differentiator is: india-offshore aerospace avionics outsourcing (fly-by-wire, autopilot, collision avoidance) strengthened by the CERTON Software acquisition. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 15,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer Electronics, Industrial IoT vs Aerospace, Defense).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.